Rigorous Logic and Amelia

Critical Thinking
Author

Jim Carr

Published

September 3, 2012

Anyone who knows me knows that I am highly skeptical regarding pseudo-scientific subjects. But, alas, I recently found myself falling prey to the very same.

As you probably know, Amelia Earhart was a famous aviator who disappeared in 1937, along with her navigator Fred Noonan, while attempting a circumnavigational flight. The prevailing theory is that Earhart ditched her Electra airplane in the Pacific after running out of fuel, and perished either in the crash itself or by drowning. There have been many “alternative” theories about her disappearance, many of them quite fantastic (she was captured by the Japanese and executed as a spy, she faked her death and lived out her life incognito, to name a couple.)

Recently, though, there’s been a lot of news coverage around the possibility that, instead of flying toward her original destination of Howland Island, she and Fred Noonan actually crash landed on Gardner Island (now called Nikumaroro), and lived there for a time as castaways. On the surface, the theory seems pretty compelling:

TIGHAR (the organization doing the research) subsequently conducted a search for Earhart’s airplane in the waters around Gardner Island. This is fascinating stuff, and I found myself really hoping they’d find something. Then, I found some articles doing a more clear-headed analysis of this theory:

In short, it sounds like TIGHAR is way too heavily invested in a positive outcome and is conducting pathological science.

Personally, I fell prey to a number of logical fallacies:

The lesson? Maintain logical diligence!